Central West Health & Rehabilitation
P: (08)9965 0697 F: (08)9964 7528

News


The most effective worksite health promotion program Oct 9th, 2014
These are tips that will assist you in making the most effective worksite health promotion program you can. Use them alongside the 8 steps to an effective health promotion program, and you will be halfway there!


An effective health promotion program will do the following:



  • Be coordinated by a person with the necessary skills and resources to commit to the project.

  • Have the long-term commitment of the company (workers, management, directors) to achieve long-term results.

  • Be integrated with the operations of the company.

  • Have the capacity to adapt when the needs of the business or its workforce change.

  • Be available to everyone in the company.

  • Involve consultation between managers and workers to guide the direction of the program.

  • Use resources within the workplace, as well as those available outside the workplace (such as community resources), to reduce the cost of the program.

  • Be a mix of low-cost strategies with higher-cost and commitment strategies.  

  • Reinforce and support the company health and safety plan.

  • Use external experts and agencies for addressing specific problem areas within your business, e.g. quitting smoking.

  • Involve senior management participation in the activities, exercises and strategies that make up the program.

  • Be promoted to workers to:

  • encourage participation voluntarily;

  • increase understanding of the program and its advantages; and

  • increase awareness and involvement in improving the program.

  • Demonstrate the benefits of working with the company to potential workers.

  • Not look down upon workers for not participating.

  • Be reviewed regularly and reported back to senior management.



Remember, there are many factors that can affect a person’s health and well-being, both physically and psychologically. Some of these factors will exist within the workplace, e.g. relationships with colleagues, working environment, level of job satisfaction, and some of these factors will exist outside the workplace, e.g. personal relationships, living conditions, lifestyle choices.

 

Central West Health and Rehabilitation can provide cost effective assistance. Contacts


 


Work disability among workers with knee arthritis Sep 22nd, 2014
The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) among individuals active in the workforce will increase considerably in the next generation and a significant percentage of these individuals are expected to experience work disability because of this disease.

Knee OA is responsible for prolonged sick leaves and early retirement in a small percentage of workers; however, many workers will have the disease for a long time and remain active in the workforce, not achieving their optimal productivity. Knee OA seems to affect partial work disability or ‘presenteeism’, defined as the loss of work productivity in terms of quantity or quality because of an illness or an injury in individuals who are present at their job, rather than absenteeism.

graphic

The above review was to summarize the existing knowledge on:

(a) work disability risk factors;

(b) efficient interventions to reduce work disability in individuals with knee OA.

 

Risk factors

The only study (Bieleman et al., 2013) that answered the research question on work disability risk factors provided data from a large-scale prospective cohort of good quality. On the basis of this study, age and previous work absence episodes can be viewed as predictors of work disability for OA patients. Bieleman et al. mainly focused on physical personal factors; however, it is now well established that psychological factors such as perceived job strain, social support from co-workers and supervisors, job satisfaction, and self-efficacy influence work participation among individuals with RA and other MSK disorders. Work environment (physical work demands, work adaptation) could also play a major role.

 

Interventions

Only two studies on work disability intervention were found, the results of these studies converged to conclude that compared with standard care interventions, education-based interventions seemed to be more effective in reducing work disability.

 



Excessive occupational sitting is not a “safe system of work” - Is it time to implement risk control strategies Aug 29th, 2014
graphicBeing able to work usually has a positive impact on health. However, changes in the physical demands of work and increased use of computers have led to many workers now being employed in sedentary jobs. While these have traditionally been thought of as safe work environments, recent evidence suggests this mode of work — often involving long uninterrupted periods of sitting — may be hazardous, contributing substantially to the growing chronic disease burden associated with obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Importantly, being sedentary (ie, too much sitting) is not the same as being physically inactive. Insufficient client physical activity is defined in the public health context as not meeting the guidelines to accumulate at least 2.5 to 5 hours of moderate-intensity physical activity per week. Both physical inactivity and sedentary time have an impact on health: physical inactivity is estimated to account for 5.5% of all-cause premature mortality, and excessive sitting time, after adjusting for physical activity, accounts for 5.9%.

Even if workers meet physical activity guidelines (i.e. are physically active), they can still have high exposure to sedentary time!

Work health and safety laws in Australia and other jurisdictions require employers to provide a "safe system of work". For example, section 19 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 states that the "primary duty of care" is to "ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers" by, among other things, "provision and maintenance of safe systems of work".

This has lead a number of experts voice the following (Straker et al, 2014):

a) the systems of work commonly observed in contemporary offices demonstrate a high likelihood of excessive sitting hazard;

b) the degree of harm associated with this hazard is likely to be substantial;

c) the evidence for this is now widely known;

d) there are available ways to minimise the risk; and

e) the cost of these strategies is proportionate to the risk.

For these reasons many advanced organisations are implementing risk control strategies. Some risk reduction strategies, such as introducing standing meetings, are costless, while other strategies have a cost. Changes to work systems can reduce sedentary time. Alterations to the individual physical environment (eg, sit–stand workstations or active workstations) and combined approaches (including individual, environmental and organisational changes) have achieved substantial reductions in total occupational sitting time and prolonged unbroken sitting time.

In an aging population, those organisations that don’t may find themselves having to catch up as legislation and Health Professionals start to recognise available evidence suggesting contemporary offices are failing to provide a “safe system of work” for their patients.

For example, Doctors should be prescribing behaviour to reduce occupational sedentary exposure where this may exacerbate, or be exacerbated by, an existing medical condition. A doctor who is aware that a patient has a prolapsed disc in the spine would require the patient to refrain from lifting heavy objects at work. In the same way, a doctor who is aware that a patient’s cardiovascular condition necessitates remaining active and avoiding excessive sedentary exposure should inform the patient and employer of the need for the patient to regularly move to maintain wellbeing!

STRATEGIES TO HELP YOU STAND UP, SIT LESS, MOVE MORE


Strategies to help you stand up, sit less and move more Aug 29th, 2014
Many advanced organisations are implementing strategies to reduce prolonged sitting. Some risk reduction strategies, such as introducing standing meetings, are costless, while other strategies have a cost. Changes to work systems can reduce sedentary time. Alterations to the individual physical environment (eg, sit–stand workstations or active workstations) and combined approaches (including individual, environmental and organisational changes) have achieved substantial reductions in total occupational sitting time and prolonged unbroken sitting time.

graphic

Here are 12 strategies to help you stand up, sit less and move more


  1. Walk over and talk to colleagues instead of emailing them.

  2. Remove bins and/or printers from your office and use central ones.

  3. Dispose of waste and/or collect printing more frequently.

  4. Drink more water so you have to go to the water cooler (and bathroom) more often.

  5. Use a bathroom that is further away.

  6. Step outside for fresh air.

  7. Use the stairs instead of the lift.

  8. Use an active way of commuting to work (walk or ride a bike, stand up in the train, or stand up to wait for your train/bus).

  9. Park your car further away from your workplace and have a short walk, or park in short-term parking so you have to walk back to move your car.

  10. Have lunch away from your desk.

  11. Walk laps of the floor at regular intervals to break up the day.

  12. Walk around the neighbourhood at lunch. You can mark out two or three timed walking routes to fit into your working day and promote variety.




 


Scientists Discover Area of Brain Responsible for Exercise Motivation Aug 27th, 2014


Scientists at Seattle Children’s Research Institute have discovered an area of the brain that could control a person’s motivation to exercise and participate in other rewarding activities – potentially leading to improved treatments for depression.

Researchers have discovered that a tiny region of the brain – the dorsal medial habenula – controls the desire to exercise in mice. The structure of the habenula is similar in humans and rodents and these basic functions in mood regulation and motivation are likely to be the same across species.

Exercise is one of the most effective non-pharmacological therapies for depression. Determining that such a specific area of the brain may be responsible for motivation to exercise could help researchers develop more targeted, effective treatments for depression.

Changes in physical activity and the inability to enjoy rewarding or pleasurable experiences are two hallmarks of major depression. But the brain pathways responsible for exercise motivation have not been well understood. 

The study used mouse models that were genetically engineered to block signals from the dorsal medial habenula. Compared to typical mice, who love to run in their exercise wheels, the genetically engineered mice were lethargic and ran far less.

In a second part of the studye, the mice could “choose” to activate this area of the brain by turning one of two response wheels with their paws. The mice strongly preferred turning the wheel that stimulated the dorsal medial habenula, demonstrating that this area of the brain is tied to rewarding behaviour.



Factors influencing return to work after hip and knee replacement Aug 27th, 2014
Hip and knee arthritis causes significant problems in the working-age population and can lead to a reduced quality of life, change in employment or unemployment. The 10th National Joint Registry reported that 18–20% of patients undergoing hip and knee replacement in England and Wales were under the age of 60 years (NJR. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 10th Annual Report, 2013. www.njrcentre.org.uk)

Heavy lifting and bending have been reported as important factors in the development and progression of arthritis. The effect of arthritis on employment depends on the type of work usually performed, with manual or lifting jobs associated with increased levels of unemployment due to arthritis. In addition to a loss of employment, arthritis has also been associated with a prolonged sickness absence or a change in the type of work performed.

Studies have quantitatively assessed the role of surgery in returning the patient to work after joint replacement. Joint replacement may enable patients to continue working, which may be more cost-effective in the long term as patients remain economically productive members of the society. However literature is sparse regarding factors affecting return to work after knee or hip replacement.


The above review of qualitative and quantitative literature aimed to address the following questions (See table 2):

1) What are the employed patient’s expectations from a joint replacement before and after surgery?

2) Who is most at risk of not returning to work after joint replacement surgery?

3) What external factors are important to help patients return to work?

4) Does age of the patient determine their ability/motivation to return to work?

5) Are patients able to return to work at the same level? 




Infographic - Sitting and Injury Aug 24th, 2014



Infographic - Coffee, Alcohol, Water Aug 22nd, 2014



Infographic - Injury First Aid Aug 18th, 2014



Hypoglycemia Aug 5th, 2014
handoutgraphicHypoglycemia is a condition that occurs when the blood glucose level has dropped too low, usually below 4mmol/L, although some people may have symptoms at a slightly higher level. Hypoglycaemia is commonly referred to as a ‘hypo’, low blood glucose or insulin reaction. It is important to treat hypoglycaemia quickly to stop the blood glucose level from falling even lower.

Hypoglycaemia is most common in people who inject insulin or are taking tablets to manage their diabetes. It is not a problem for those who do not take medication to manage their diabetes. Talk to your doctor or trusted health professional (diabetes educator, exercise physiologist, pharmacist etc) to find out your risk.

 



Video - Blood Presure Aug 4th, 2014



One in five serious workplace injuries involve a tradie Aug 2nd, 2014
graphicAustralia's hundreds of thousands of tradies may enjoy the outdoors, but it does come at a price with one in five of all serious workplace injuries involving a tradie.

Startling figures from the Australian Physiotherapy Association's latest health report, released today, show tradies have among the highest number of injuries, musculoskeletal conditions and other health and safety risks of any profession. Many from smaller businesses who are harder for national health and safety initiatives to reach.  

Released as part of Tradies National Health Month, the Stop Trading Your Health Away report shows nearly one in five serious workplace-related injuries involve a tradie, making them one of the most affected professions in Australia.

Musculoskeletal health costs $20.9 billion annually in direct health and lost productivity costs in Australia.

Within the industry, construction workers are currently claiming 34 per cent of workers’ compensation claims. More than half of these claims were related to muscular stress while handling a range of materials, tools or other equipment.

Tradies are also among one of the largest proportions of occupations with the highest incidence of early retirement. Statistics show that tradies are 35 per cent to 50 per cent more likely to retire before the age of 60 compared to professional workers.

 

graphic

Is Manual Handling Training Worth it?



Video - Nerve Pain Aug 1st, 2014



Video - Phases of Pain Jul 31st, 2014



Case Study - Concord General Hospital, Sydney Jul 27th, 2014
grphicEmployers, insurers and workers’ groups have expressed a growing interest in return-to-work (RTW) interventions after injury or illness. As disability management is increasingly being integrated into employers’ and insurers’ mandates, there has been a focus on workplace-based RTW interventions.

Some injuries take longer to heal due to the nature of the injury and management. We have generally found three types of disability groups have come to light over the years.

The first is the short duration claim where the patient has a well-defined acute episode (i.e. flu, strain or sprain). These cases will return to work often with minimal intervention.

The second (and often most difficult) group represents the patients with sub-acute or progressive diseases or injuries. This population often needs help with ensuring the medical interventions are enough to progress back to health. They may need help in finding their way through the health care maze and psychosocial issues can be a major barrier to RTW.

The third group are those with terminal or debilitating diseases, such as Chronic Pain, Cancer or Multiple Sclerosis, that may eventually prevent return to work.


Concord General Hospital in Sydney is a self insurer, who in 2003-4 found themselves with a huge number of open claims (~300), and a spate of very difficult cases who went on to have chronic pain syndromes. The organisation felt they were failing injured workers and that something needed to change.

The initial step was to change their existing rehabilitation policy. They developed a database to track workers from notification to finalisation. They developed resources such as suitable duties lists for a majority of departments, and increased the role of managers in the rehabilitation process. They also took steps to increase the level of communication by having regular meetings between supervisors and managers of major departments to review claims and provide comparative data.

The consensus was that the first 4 weeks after an incident/injury was the answer, – after that you start to lose control! They instigated a rapid assessment and early intervention process, which included an assessment psychosocial risk (i.e. Yellow Flags). The idea was that high risk individuals needed to be identified in the first week/s. Nothing different needed to be done; only it needed to be done earlier. It was also important that the GP was in control of the whole process through consultation and approval.

The first question to answer was; “can these high risk individuals be found early, and if so, do they actually costs more?” Injured workers filled out a psychosocial risk questionnaire and were followed through until they returned to work with a final certificate. Each injured worker was categorised and claim costs were reviewed and compared across the high, medium and low risk groups.

The answer to Question 1 appeared to be a resounding YES! (see image)


The next question was then “what can be done about it?” Concord’s approach was to; (a) activate an independent Vocational Rehab Provider within first 2 weeks; (b) complete an independent psychological assessment, and subsequent treatment within 2 weeks; (c) complete an independent Medical Consultation within 4 weeks; (d) have the file reviewed if not returned to work within 4-6 weeks.

The emphasise of the above approach did not appear to do anything different to what usually happens, it simply did it much earlier in the management process.

The results were quite impressive; primarily there was a 25% reduction in the costs of each ‘high risk’ claim. This equated to a $4331.00 saving per high risk claim. (see image)



Implications:

There is a significant difference between the 20% in the “high risk” category and the other 80% who manage pretty well with ‘usual care’.

Psychosocial risk factors (i.e. ‘Yellow Flags’) predict the cost of a workers compensation claim within 48 hours regardless of what or where the injury occurs.

The provision of an early and aggressive assessment and intervention, lead by a trusted GP can reduce costs in high risk claims.



Vocational Rehabilitation - What do they do? Jul 26th, 2014
Approved Vocational Rehabilitation Providers (Voc Rehab) can assist an injured worker if there are problems with the return to work process. Voc Rehab providers are commonly health professionals such as occupational therapists, physiotherapists, exercise physiologists or psychologists who ‘generally’ have expertise in addressing the physical, psychological and/or workplace barriers that may prevent an injured worker returning to work.

Workplace rehabilitation providers are approved by WorkCover WA and have the qualifications, experience and expertise appropriate to provide timely intervention with services based on the assessed need of the worker and the workplace.

GraphicWhat does a workplace rehabilitation provider do?

A voc rehab provider is essentially an injury management co-ordinator. Voc Rehab will attempt to deliver an appropriate professional return to work program when the situation requires an external provider (see below).

If an initial assessment indicates that rehabilitation services are recommended, the rehabilitation provider must discuss the findings of the assessment with the employer, the injured worker and the treating medical practitioner.

The rehabilitation provider should give a copy of their plan to the injured worker, employer and treating medical practitioner. The insurer should also receive a copy of the service plan; in most instances, the insurer will provide approval for payment of rehabilitation expenses as part of the claim.

In all circumstances, employers should remain the workplace decision maker regarding return to work activities.

What rehabilitation services may be recommended?

Rehabilitation providers can provide any of the following services in helping workers return to work:

- support counselling

- vocational counselling

- purchase of aids and appliances

- case management

- retraining criteria assistance

- specialised retraining program assistance

- training and education

- workplace activities

- placement activities

- assessments (functional capacity, vocational, ergonomic, job demands, workplace and aids and appliances)

- general reports

When should a workplace rehabilitation provider be engaged?

The worker is unable to carry out pre-injury duties and there is a need to identify alternative or modified duties with either the same employer, or with a new employer.

There is a need to complete a practical assessment of a worker’s capacity to return to work (for example, when there are conflicting opinions of the worker’s physical or psychological capacity to return to work; or there are reports of ongoing symptoms when the worker is at work).

The worker is experiencing problems associated with returning to work (for example, personality clashes with worksite injury management staff.).

Modifidations are required to the workplace are being considered to assist the workers return to work (for example, special lifting equipment or special seating arrangements).

There is a need to assess the suitability of a return to work program with a new employer if this is identified by the injured worker, employer and treating medical practitioner as the new rehabilitation goal.

There is a need to determine whether retraining is likely required. (back)

Case Study: Concord Hospital

Who pays for a workplace rehabilitation provider?

Vocational rehabilitation providers are approved by WorkCover WA and their costs are covered by the Prescribed Amount in every workers’ compensation claim. Costs may vary according to the services they provide, but the maximum amount they can charge is determined by WorkCover WA and reviewed annually. These costs will add to your yearly claim costs, used to determine your insurance premiums.

How to activate a referral to a workplace rehabilitation provider?

GraphicAn injured worker, employer or treating medical practitioner can initiate a referral to a workplace rehabilitation provider - see the list of Approved Vocational Rehabilitation Providers. However, to comply with their conditions of approval, the provider must ensure all parties agree to the referral for rehabilitation services.

A referral may be completed on the Workplace Rehabilitation Referral Form or may be made on the worker’s First or Progress Certificate of Capacity.

Note: Injured workers have the right to choose their vocational rehabilitation provider, even when the referral is made by a medical practitioner or employer.


August is Tradies National Health Month Jul 25th, 2014
Banner

Throughout the month of August the APA and Steel Blue will run Tradies National Health Month – a health awareness campaign to educate tradies on the importance of full body health and safety. The Australian Physiotherapy Association and Blue Steel have teamed up to create a month that focuses on full-body health and safety for tradies to improve awareness and support in this area.

Click the Link below to Play the Game - Pain Breaker

Graphic

 

These organisations have also developed a wide array of great handouts and resources, which we have provided to help Tradies look after their minds and bodies. A few are provided below, many more are avaliable at the website.

graphic graphic 

graphic graphic

 



Return to work following Shoulder Surgery Jul 24th, 2014
shoulder imageRotator cuff tears are a common shoulder problem affecting more than half the population older than sixty years of age. Surgery may be used to treat a rotator cuff disorder if the injury is very severe or if nonsurgical treatment has failed to improve shoulder strength and movement sufficiently.

Surgery to repair a torn rotator cuff tendon usually involves; (a) removing loose fragments of tendon, bursa, and other debris from the space in the shoulder where the rotator cuff moves (debridement); (b) making more room for the rotator cuff tendon so it is not pinched or irritated. If needed, this includes shaving bone or removing bone spurs from the point of the shoulder blade (subacromial smoothing); (c) sewing the torn edges of the supraspinatus tendon together and to the top of the upper arm bone (humerus).

Acevedo etal, 2014 attempt to determine common clinical practices among 372 shoulder and elbow surgeons with regard to rotator cuff repair and management, including return to work practices. 89% of the surgeons surveyed suggested dedicating over half of their practice to the treatment of shoulder pathology.

Regards Healing Rates

Half of surgeons suggested 80% to 90% healing rate for small tears(<2cm).

70% to 43.1% of surgeons suggest 80% healing rate for large tears (2 to 4 cm).

49% of surgeons suggested 50% to 60% healing rate for massive tears (>5 cm).

70% of survey participants told their patients that their shoulder would be 'as good as it gets' one year after surgery.

A large number of surgeons (55.3%) do not allow their patients to drive a car until the arm is out of the sling full time.

91.3% of respondents reported that they would perform surgery on a current smoker despite the body of evidence showing the relationship of smoking and rotator cuff disease, and smokers having a higher retear rate. Surgeons often have a difficult time getting patients to quit smoking and smokers are still able to attain successful outcomes in most cases, albeit with higher risk of failure and longer recovery times.

Regards Lifting Restrictions

37.3% of surgeons recommended a lifting limit of 0.5kg at one month, and 29.4% allowed 4.5kg at three months. By six months and one year after surgery, a majority of respondents advised their patients to let pain be their guide as a limit to lifting (62.7% and 72.8%, respectively).

Regards Return to Work

Surgeons were asked when they allowed their patients to return to work at a sedentary job and to a manual labor job after repair of small, large, and massive rotator cuff tears.

The most common response in regard to return to a sedentary job was one to two weeks for small tears (41.2%), large tears (38.2%), and massive tears (34.3%).

For a manual labor jobs, two responses were most common; 34.7% allow patients to return to work at three months, and 35.6% allow return to work at four months after repair of small tears. Additionally, 17.8% of respondents allowed return at six months for small tears. After repair of a large tear or a massive tear, respondents most commonly allow their patients to return to manual labor at four months (29.4%) or six months (34%), respectively.

In regard to patients with Workers’ Compensations claims, a large percentage of surgeons do not allow a return to manual labor until six months postoperatively for small tears (56.6%). There was a consensus with surgeons who allow return to work after six months for large tears (68%). After repair of a massive tear, 40.2% allow return to work after at least six months, but 38.2% responded 'maybe never.'

 




Return to work following routine Knee Arthroscopy Jul 19th, 2014
Knee injuries are a common workplace problem and Knee arthoscopy is the most common procedure performed by orthopaedic surgeons (Salata et al, 2010). However there is scanty literature documenting expected recovery duration (often suggested as anywhere from nine days to four weeks for routine uncomplicated arthroscopy).

Graphic

The above study of a military population noted that while patients were able to walk around without any support at two weeks post surgery, 88% still had restriction to activities of daily living (and therefore work) because of knee related problems. Function improved gradually over the following 12 weeks. At 6 weeks 91% resumed their preinjury status which reached 94% in eight weeks.

Predictors of poor  outcomes include total removal of the meniscus or removal of the peripheral meniscal rim, lateral meniscectomy, degenerative meniscal tears (more common in older age groups), presence of chondral damage (more common in older age groups), presence of hand osteoarthritis suggestive of genetic predisposition, and increased body mass index.

Psychosocial factors (anger, depression, social support [i.e. workplace support]) play a significant role in recovery and are predictive of surgical outcomes (Rosenberger et al, 2006). Patients undergoing surgery must cope with the psychological and physical stress that often accompanies injuries and surgical procedures. In addition, patients must cope with the demands of the recovery process, which likely include managing postoperative pain and limitations in physical functioning (Rosenberger et al, 2004).


Implications

Following routine knee arthrscope the majority of workers should have capacity for 'suitable' modified duties by 2 week. However remember some patient will still be having considerable difficulty with tasks of daily life such as dressing, climbing stairs and getting up from sitting.

The majority of workers should be able to complete normal duties by 6-8 weeks following surgical date. However, some 6-10% still may need some duty modification beyond this.

Those at risk of a longer recovery can be predicted pre-surgically or early post surgically by the following:

  1. Age

  2. Type of procedure (full meniscus removal, peripheral meniscus lession, cartlidge damage and or microfissuring)

  3. Poor Lifestyle factors (High BMI, current smoker)

  4. Psychosocial factors (anger, depression, poor social/workplace support)





Video - Mentally Healthy Small Business Jul 18th, 2014



Infographic - Costs of Unhappy Employees Jul 18th, 2014

Graphic



9 tips to reduce the risks for an ageing workforce Jul 17th, 2014
Australia’s population will both grow strongly and become older in the medium term. This population growth and ageing will affect labour supply, economic output, infrastructure requirements and governments’ budgets, and has lead to the gradual increase in the retirement age from 65-70 for those people born after 1965.

As for safety on the job, workers who are older actually tend to experience fewer workplace injuries than their younger colleagues. This may be because of experience gathered from years in the workplace, or because of factors such as increased caution and awareness of relative physical limitations.

This caution is well-founded. When accidents involving older workers do occur, the workers often require more time to heal, underscoring the need for a well-planned return to work program.

Also evidence suggests incidents affecting older workers are more likely to be fatal. A recent Safe Work Australia document suggested people over 65 have a higher fatality rate (7.73 fatalities per 100,000 workers) than their young work collegues (0.98 fatalities per 100 000 workers). This underscores the need for employers to be mindful of how best to gradually adapt the conditions of work to protect workers as well as explore opportunities for preventative programs that can maintain or build the health of employees through their working life.


Here are 9 tips you can use to eliminate or reduce the risks posed to older workers in your workplace:


  1. Ensure that a person (regardless of age) is suited to the task and can carry it out safely; Pre-employment Physical Assessments are vital.

  2. Adapt tasks to suit older workers, e.g. an older worker with reduced physical strength may spend more time operating machinery than labouring;

  3. Rotate physically demanding or repetitive tasks;

  4. Provide ergonomically-designed work area and workstations for all workers;

  5. Regularly assess stress levels of workers and implement stress management training if required;

  6. Train all workers in injury prevention strategies (it is important to keep in mind that as you age, the pace and way that you learn changes, meaning that training requirements may be different for older workers and training may require repetition);

  7. Ensure workplace lighting is adequate for the job at hand;

  8. If possible, offer older workers flexible work arrangements, (e.g. reduced hours, fixed term contracts, working from home); and

  9. Consult workers about where they are having trouble and keep them informed about what you are doing to reduce the risks.




Cost savings from early ergonomics involvement in projects Jul 17th, 2014
graphicRegardless of the other benefits that may be realized from ergonomic improvements, managers usually are not able to justify providing funds for the intervention unless there is a clear economic benefit to be derived. Accordingly, in developing an ergonomics proposal for management, it is extremely important to clearly identify the costs and economic benefits that can be expected and outline how they will be measured.

Fortunately, properly planned and implemented ergonomics projects usually do result in significant economic benefits, and the literature consistently has shown that the earlier there is professional ergonomics participation in workplace design, the less costly is the effort.

For example, a number of studies have suggested the ergonomics portion of the engineering budget increases from about 1% of the budget when ergonomists are brought in at the beginning of a development project, to more than 12% when brought in after the system is put into operation.

This increase is believed to happen when ergonomists are brought in late in the project because serious human–system interface problems have surfaced that require major retrofits in order to correct them. A second major cost saving of early, or pre-emptive, ergonomics involvement can be in reducing the total cost of the design budget.



Personnel-related benefits from pre-emptive ergonomic involvement include:

Increased output per worker- Increased output per worker can be done for improvements in workplace design, hardware product design, software design and work system (macroergonomic) design.

Reduced error rate- Because correcting errors takes time, reduced errors frequently translate into increased productivity. Reducing errors also translates into fewer, accidents, and resultant reductions in equipment damage, personnel injuries, and related costs.

Reduced accidents, injuries, and illness- One of the most frequently encountered benefits. For example in one reported case study an ergonomically designed pistol grip type of knife was introduced to replace a conventional straight handle knife for deboning chickens and turkeys in a poultry packaging plant. This enabled the employees to de-bone the foul without having to significantly deviate their wrists, as was the case with the conventional knife. The resulting reduction in cases of carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, and tenosynovitis translated into a saving in workmen’s compensation of $100,000 per year.

Reduced absenteeism- Reductions in lost time from persons failing to show up to work for reasons other than accidents, injuries, or illness, already noted, also is a common outcome of effective ergonomic interventions. Reduced absenteeism also can result in a productivity increase.

Reduced turnover- When ergonomic interventions improve the quality of work life, it is not uncommon to see a reduction in turnover rate, which can represent a significant financial benefit.

Reduced training time- Reductions in training requirements may come about because work system changes result in easier to perform functions and processes that require less time to learn. Alternatively, training requirements may be reduced because of:

(a) less turnover,

(b) reductions in lost time from accidents and injuries,

(c) less absenteeism, or

(d) because fewer people are required to perform a given function

Reduced skill requirements- Improved job designs and related work system processes may also result in reducing the skill requirements required to perform some jobs

Reduced maintenance time- Ergonomic improvements to jobs, worksites, equipment, or work systems can result in reducing the system’s maintenance requirements, thus requiring fewer maintenance personnel.



Doctors With a Special Interest in Back Pain Have Poorer Knowledge About How to Treat Back Pain Jul 16th, 2014
Doctor surveys continue to demonstrate that general practitioners only partially manage low back pain (LBP) in an evidence-based way. This is despite increasing evidence that positive advice to stay active and continue or resume ordinary activities is more effective than rest and early investigation and specialist referral are unwarranted in the majority of cases. In part, this may reflect physician knowledge and beliefs, although physician behaviour may be influenced by many factors including patient expectation and other psychosocial factors.

Providers treating LBP may hold alternative beliefs regarding the association of pain and activity that may influence their practice behaviour. The preparedness of the clinicians to change may be another important barrier that has not been well studied to date.

Graphic

The aim of the above study was to determine whether general practitioners’ beliefs about LBP differ according to whether they have a special interest in back pain, musculoskeletal medicine or occupational medicine; and whether these beliefs are modified by having had continuing medical education (CME) about back pain in the previous 2 years.

The results found that GP’s that suggested a ‘special interest’ in back pain were more likely to provide back pain management contrary to the best available evidence. GP’s with a special interest in occupational medicine and physicians with recent Continued CME about back pain had significantly better back pain management beliefs.


Implications

Many other factors besides the employee's medical conditions affect outcomes– e.g. organizational, work-environmental, and social. Providing employees a preferred medical provider and building a relationship with them by presenting them with appropriate and helpful information can improve not only return to work, but also patient management.




Video - Low Back Pain Jul 16th, 2014